Curated external directory · Official links · Evidence labels
Explore publicly documented companies whose products contribute to sensing, tracking, command and control, decision support, defensive interception, autonomy, communications, space, or cyber defense. Inclusion is descriptive—not an endorsement, ranking, procurement recommendation, or claim that every listed product uses AI or autonomous force.
Answer-first summary
The directory covers publicly documented providers of sensing, intelligence, command and control, decision support, defensive interception, autonomy, communications, space, and cyber-defense technologies.
Read the supporting sectionNo. Inclusion is descriptive and source-based; the directory is not a ranking, buying guide, procurement recommendation, safety certification, or claim of independent performance verification.
Read the supporting sectionNo. Some provide sensors, communications, cybersecurity, or conventional automation. Each entry separates the documented function from the publicly known human-control arrangement.
Read the supporting sectionWhat this directory shows
Entries identify a bounded technology role, public evidence of delivery, fielding, or operational support, the applicable kill-chain stages, and the limits of what open sources establish.
What it does not show
The page does not compare prices, rank lethality, recommend products, provide sales contacts, reproduce technical procedures, or imply that a vendor statement independently proves field performance.
How control is described
Autonomous navigation, tracking, classification, sensor fusion, and terminal guidance are different from authority to select or engage a target. Unknown operating modes remain labeled as unknown.
Technology map
Many providers span several categories. The directory maps what the public record supports rather than forcing each company into a single label.
Company-to-system relationship explorer
Each relationship links one reviewed provider to one specific system, program, software platform, sensor family, or bounded product family. Filter by role, function, evidence, or subject, then compare up to four relationships without an overall ranking.
Relationship, not ownership
A manufacturer, sensor provider, software provider, or integrator may support different parts of the same chain. The explorer does not collapse those roles into one claim.
Evidence stays attached
Manufacturer descriptions, government or operator statements, independent analysis, and public unknowns retain their original evidence state.
No commercial score
Comparison is limited to documented function, relationship type, evidence state, lifecycle, human-control boundary, unknowns, and source count.
Neutral comparison
No overall score is calculated. A difference in evidence or lifecycle is not a quality ranking.
Comparison reflects reviewed public records only. It is not a recommendation, rating, export assessment, or operational-performance judgment.
Official links directory
Filters work as ordinary GET parameters without JavaScript and become instant client-side controls when JavaScript is available. Query-state pages remain shareable but are excluded from indexing.
01 · North America
United States
Provides uncrewed aircraft and loitering systems that support reconnaissance, tracking, communications relay, and bounded post-launch mission execution.
Company-controlled product material describes fielded systems used by U.S. and allied operators. Exact mission configurations and engagement-authority arrangements vary and are not completely public.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Autonomous flight, tracking, or terminal functions do not by themselves establish who authorizes a particular use of force.
Current software baselines, operator doctrine, target-selection authority, abort behavior, and deployment-specific performance are not fully public.
02 · North America
United States
Builds command-and-control software, sensor integration, counter-UAS systems, and autonomous platforms intended to connect detection, tracking, decision support, and response.
U.S. Army sources document Anduril selections and prototyping for counter-UAS fire control, reconnaissance systems, and Next Generation Command and Control.
Government or operator statement: A public government, military service, program office, or operator source documents selection, delivery, fielding, or operational use.
Public selection or field use does not establish one universal autonomy or weapons-release mode across products and missions.
Deployment-specific rules, software thresholds, operator permissions, intervention windows, and classified integrations remain undisclosed.
03 · North America / Europe
United States / Switzerland
Provides onboard autonomy and mission software for uncrewed systems, including navigation, tracking, and terminal guidance functions.
Company announcements describe government-funded delivery of autonomy kits for Ukrainian uncrewed systems. The directory treats those statements as company-reported operational evidence.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Autonomous terminal tracking after a human designation is not the same as autonomous selection of a new target.
System-by-system authorization, intervention, data-link, model, and operational-effectiveness details are incomplete publicly.
04 · Europe
United Kingdom
Provides naval combat-management and mission-system software that combines sensor information, command decisions, and effector coordination.
Company material describes INTeACT and related combat-management systems as supporting Royal Navy and allied naval operations.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
A combat-management system can automate correlation and coordination while engagement authority remains mission- and operator-specific.
Current fleet configurations, decision logic, automation modes, and interface behavior in specific operations are not public in full.
05 · Global commercial cyber
United States
Provides security telemetry, cross-domain detection, investigation, threat intelligence, and automated response used to identify and interrupt cyber intrusion chains.
The company describes the Falcon platform as a production security platform used for endpoint, identity, cloud, SIEM, threat-hunting, and response workflows.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Automated security response should remain constrained by policy, scope, and human review for consequential actions.
Customer-specific coverage, tuning, response authority, incident outcomes, and independent comparative effectiveness are not established by the product page.
06 · Europe
Germany
Provides ground-based air-defense systems that combine radar, command-and-control, launchers, and interceptors.
Company and customer-controlled public material documents IRIS-T SLM delivery and operational use by national armed forces.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Delivery and use do not disclose every authorization setting, threat-evaluation rule, or human intervention path.
Operational thresholds, engagement doctrine, network configurations, and independently audited performance remain incomplete publicly.
07 · North America
United States
Provides long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft and mission systems for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, tracking, and communications support.
Company and operator announcements document MQ-9B acquisition and operational introduction by allied air forces.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Remotely piloted or autonomous flight functions do not establish autonomous weapons-release authority.
Mission-specific control arrangements, sensor tasking, data-sharing, weapon-release procedures, and current operational deployments are not fully public.
08 · Global commercial cyber
United States
Provides telemetry analytics, threat intelligence, detection, investigation, security orchestration, validation, and incident-response services for cyber-defense operations.
Google describes SecOps and Mandiant services as production platforms and expert-led operations for detecting, investigating, validating, and responding to real cyber threats.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Automated playbooks and AI recommendations should not be treated as independent authorization for destructive or externally consequential actions.
Customer-specific detections, playbooks, retention, response authority, and incident outcomes vary and are not established by general product material.
09 · Europe
Germany / United Kingdom
Develops AI-enabled defense software and uncrewed systems intended to operate under communications constraints with declared human involvement in critical decisions.
Company statements describe frontline approval and delivery of systems for Ukraine. Those statements remain manufacturer-provided evidence.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
The company states that humans remain in or on the loop for critical decisions; public sources do not reveal every mission-specific implementation.
Independent operational validation, detailed control modes, model behavior, intervention paths, and mission configuration are incomplete publicly.
10 · Europe
Germany
Provides radar and sensor systems that detect, track, and support target acquisition for air-defense networks.
Company reporting documents delivery and operational use of TRML-4D radars in Ukraine and other European air-defense programs.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Radar tracking and target acquisition do not establish who authorizes an interceptor or how a fire-control network is configured.
Deployment locations, detailed performance, classification logic, network connections, and current operating procedures are not public in full.
11 · Middle East
Israel
Provides radar, air-defense, command-and-control, and autonomous-system technologies spanning detection through engagement.
Official company product pages describe operational radar and defense systems; HARPY is manufacturer-described as autonomously seeking and striking emitting targets after activation.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
One company supplies systems with very different authority arrangements. Radar automation, air-defense integration, and autonomous target-profile matching must not be collapsed into one label.
Operator-specific modes, safeguards, thresholds, abort mechanisms, current deployments, and independent performance evidence vary and remain incomplete.
12 · Europe
Norway
Provides air-defense command and control, interceptor integration, and missiles with bounded post-launch target-recognition functions.
Company and operator material documents NASAMS fielding and NSM use by multiple armed forces.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
NASAMS command-and-control and NSM terminal recognition involve different human-control questions. Neither should be generalized into unrestricted autonomous target selection.
Operator-specific firing doctrine, terminal recognition logic, intervention capabilities, and deployment configurations are not completely public.
13 · North America
United States
Provides resilient communications, tactical data links, space and airborne sensing, and mission systems that move observations and commands across distributed operations.
Company material describes fielded tactical communications and network products used by U.S. and allied forces.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
A communications or data-link provider enables information exchange; it does not determine the legality or authority of downstream actions.
Network configurations, encryption, node locations, mission data, operational availability, and specific command relationships are not public and are intentionally excluded.
14 · Europe
Italy
Provides radars, sensors, command-and-control, and mission-system integration for air, land, naval, and joint operations.
Company-controlled material describes C2 and radar systems used in national and multinational exercises and operational architectures.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Sensor fusion and C2 support do not establish autonomous engagement authority or one universal human-machine workflow.
Software baselines, national configurations, weapons-release authority, performance, and operational data remain incomplete publicly.
15 · North America
United States
Provides combat systems, sensors, command-and-control integration, missiles, space systems, and the foundational seven-stage Cyber Kill Chain framework.
U.S. Navy sources document Aegis as a deployed automated command-and-control and weapons-control system installed across active surface combatants.
Government or operator statement: A public government, military service, program office, or operator source documents selection, delivery, fielding, or operational use.
Aegis supports several modes and missions. Public architecture does not establish that every engagement is fully automatic or AI-driven.
Current software baselines, doctrine statements, automation settings, thresholds, crew permissions, and classified integrations remain nonpublic.
16 · Europe
European multinational
Provides guided weapons and air-defense systems integrated into naval and land command-and-control networks.
Company and operator material documents Sea Ceptor entry into Royal Navy service and integration with combat-management systems.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Guidance and integration do not disclose who authorizes every engagement or what automation mode is used in a specific operation.
Engagement doctrine, detailed seeker behavior, command settings, deployment locations, and independently audited performance are not fully public.
17 · Global commercial cyber
United States
Provides SIEM, XDR, threat intelligence, investigation, and response tooling used by security operations centers to detect and interrupt cyberattack progression.
Microsoft describes Sentinel and Defender as production security platforms for multi-cloud and multiplatform detection, investigation, orchestration, and response.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
AI summaries and automated playbooks should remain subject to deterministic policy, least privilege, and human review for consequential actions.
Customer-specific configurations, detection coverage, retention, response authority, and incident outcomes are not established by a general product page.
18 · Europe
Estonia
Provides uncrewed ground vehicles used for logistics, reconnaissance, casualty evacuation, route clearance, and payload integration.
Company announcements document THeMIS deliveries and use in Ukraine. The public record supports operational deployment of the platform, not one universal weapon-control mode.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Milrem has publicly distinguished autonomous mobility from human-controlled weapon functions in selected configurations.
Configuration-specific autonomy, payload, control-link, lost-communications, and engagement-authority arrangements remain variable and incompletely public.
19 · Middle East
Israel
Provides battle-management and command-and-control software for real-time sensor fusion, threat evaluation, resource coordination, and operational response.
mPrest publicly identifies itself as the developer of the Iron Dome battle-management and weapon-control software and describes defense deployments of its C4I platform.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Public material does not establish one universal human authorization arrangement for Iron Dome or other deployments.
Detailed algorithms, confidence thresholds, launcher-assignment rules, operator permissions, and deployment-specific fallback modes remain nonpublic.
20 · North America
United States
Provides integrated battle management, sensors, and mission systems that connect distributed observations to defensive command-and-control and effectors.
U.S. Army sources document IBCS initial operational capability, full-rate production approval, and delivery to the force.
Government or operator statement: A public government, military service, program office, or operator source documents selection, delivery, fielding, or operational use.
“Any sensor, best shooter” integration does not establish that machine learning is used in every function or that firing is autonomous.
Track-fusion logic, operator permissions, engagement settings, software baselines, and deployment-specific networks remain nonpublic.
21 · North America
United States
Provides data integration, geospatial workflow, intelligence fusion, and decision-support software used by defense and security organizations.
Official U.S. sources document Palantir involvement in Project Maven and the Army TITAN prototype program.
Government or operator statement: A public government, military service, program office, or operator source documents selection, delivery, fielding, or operational use.
Decision support, target nomination, and workflow integration do not by themselves establish independent weapons-release authority.
Model thresholds, source weighting, operator workflow, current deployments, integration details, and error rates are not fully public.
22 · Global commercial cyber
United States
Provides a security-operations platform that centralizes telemetry, correlates attacks, prioritizes cases, guides investigations, and automates bounded response workflows.
The company describes Cortex XSIAM as a production SOC platform used by commercial and public organizations for detection, investigation, and response.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Autonomous or agentic SOC features should not be treated as authorization for unbounded external action; human and policy guardrails remain material.
Customer-specific automation, approval gates, detection coverage, incident outcomes, and independent performance are not established by product marketing.
23 · Europe
Germany
Provides electric vertical-takeoff reconnaissance aircraft and software for mapping, surveillance, and target-acquisition support.
Company statements document repeated government orders and operational use of Vector systems in Ukraine.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Reconnaissance and target-acquisition support do not establish autonomous weapon release or engagement authority.
Current payloads, software versions, deployment locations, target workflows, control modes, and independent effectiveness data are incomplete publicly.
24 · Middle East
Israel
Provides defensive interception, active protection, guidance, and battle-management technologies spanning sensing through assessment.
Rafael product pages describe operational systems including Iron Dome and SPICE. Performance figures on company pages remain manufacturer claims unless independently corroborated.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Highly automated defense, terminal guidance, and active protection are distinct functions with different operator roles and target contexts.
Deployment-specific authorization, thresholds, override arrangements, detailed logic, and independently audited performance are not fully public.
25 · North America
United States
Provides radar, air and missile defense, terminal defense, interceptors, and command-and-control components used by U.S. and allied forces.
U.S. Navy sources document Phalanx and SeaRAM deployment; company and operator material documents NASAMS and Patriot fielding.
Government or operator statement: A public government, military service, program office, or operator source documents selection, delivery, fielding, or operational use.
Phalanx can complete a bounded automatic defensive sequence, while other RTX systems use different command and authorization arrangements.
Mode-specific operation, local doctrine, software thresholds, crew permissions, and named-incident control settings are usually not public.
26 · Europe
Sweden
Provides radar, air-defense command-and-control, and naval combat-management systems used by national and allied forces.
Company material describes operational deployments and integration of Giraffe, 9AIR, and 9LV systems.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Detection, track fusion, and engagement coordination do not establish autonomous firing or one universal operator workflow.
National configurations, fire-control permissions, integration details, performance, and current operational states are not public in full.
27 · North America
United States
Provides autonomy software and uncrewed aircraft for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, communications, and mission execution.
Company reporting documents V-BAT operations with the Royal Netherlands Navy and other government users.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Autonomous flight and ISR task execution do not establish independent weapon-release authority.
Mission-specific autonomy, payload, human-control, data-link, intervention, and operational-performance details are not fully public.
28 · Global commercial cyber
United States
Provides security data analytics, detection, investigation, orchestration, and response capabilities used by security operations centers.
Splunk describes Enterprise Security as a production SIEM and security-operations platform combining detection, investigation, response, and progressive automation.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Progressive automation and agentic features should retain explicit approval and policy boundaries for consequential actions.
Customer-specific data, tuning, coverage, playbooks, human approval, and incident outcomes are not established by a general product page.
29 · Europe
France
Provides naval combat-management, sensors, communications, space, and cyber technologies used by national and allied operators.
Company material describes TACTICOS as an operational naval combat-management system used across multiple fleets.
Manufacturer-described: The company publicly describes the capability or operational use. This is not independent performance verification.
Combat-management integration can automate detection, correlation, and coordination without establishing one engagement-authority model.
Fleet-specific configurations, source code, thresholds, permissions, operating modes, and deployment details are not public in full.
Try removing a filter or searching for a broader technology function.
Reset directoryEditorial method
A company appears only when reviewed public material supports a role in a military, defensive, intelligence, communications, space, autonomy, command-and-control, or cyber-defense chain and the entry can preserve the distinction among official operator evidence, company self-description, independent analysis, and unknowns.
The relationship explorer adds a second layer: each relationship must resolve to a reviewed company, a current Atlas system or bounded product-family record, and at least one current source record. It records functions, lifecycle, human-control boundaries, unknowns, and what the relationship does not establish.
Presence in this directory is not a safety certification, legal conclusion, investment opinion, endorsement, export-control assessment, procurement recommendation, or proof that every listed product is currently operational. Product availability, ownership, program status, and deployment can change; use the linked source trail and review date.